California’s Growing Cultural Blacklist – WSJ

- Advertisement -

The State Capitol is illuminated in rainbow colors to celebrate PRIDE month in Sacramento, June 21.



Photo:

Paul Kitagaki Jr./Zuma Press

In a little-noticed but significant decision in April, the Supreme Court refused to hear a case involving California’s ban on state-funded travel to Texas and 11 other red states. Sacramento’s culture warriors heard the message and this week extended their blacklist.

Soon, the California Attorney General announced, public funds also can’t be used for travel to Arkansas, Florida, Montana, North Dakota and West Virginia. California’s expanding regime of political sanctions will surely be reciprocated.

California justified its travel ban against Texas because the state’s religious-freedom legislation allows religious foster-care providers to decline to place children with same-sex couples. In Fulton v. Philadelphia, decided last month, the Justices ruled 9-0 against government efforts to coerce a Catholic foster care agency with a similar policy.

No matter the constitutionality of diverse state policies, California’s Legislature wants to impose economic costs on the residents of states that disagree with it. More than 35% of Americans outside California now live in one of the boycotted states. Four of the five states added this week were targeted because of policies on transgender athletes in school sports.

The state-funded travel ban has disrupted academic exchange between universities and travel by legislators, though naturally it contains an exemption for California to conduct “revenue collection.” As more states are targeted and impose their own restrictions on California (as Oklahoma already has), the economic and political harm will compound. Yet the Supreme Court, against the protests of Justices Samuel Alito and

Clarence Thomas,

has been reluctant in recent decades to resolve disputes between states under its original jurisdiction.

Economic warfare between states is an ominous trend in a polarized republic, and if the Court won’t stop it then perhaps Congress can. Would Democratic Senators from Montana and West Virginia endorse boycotts on their own constituents? Representatives interested in calming the culture wars should look at ways to use their Commerce Clause or spending powers to prohibit or deter interstate government boycotts.

Main Street: Ten years ago secular crusaders began their attempt to silence Jack Phillips for refusing to bake a cake for a same sex marriage. Today their intolerance continues over a cake celebrating gender transition. Image: Alliance Defending Freedom

Copyright ©2020 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Appeared in the July 2, 2021, print edition.

Latest news
Related news

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here